L5M1 Dumps - Managing Teams and Individuals Practice Exam Questions

Thehuman relations approach to managementdeveloped in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also bysocial needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.

The foundation of this school came from theHawthorne Studies(Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.

Key principles of the human relations approach include:

Focus on people rather than just processes– recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.

Motivation through recognition and belonging– linking to theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s motivators.

Leadership style matters– supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.

Team dynamics are critical– informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.

Job satisfaction drives performance– happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal.

Advantagesof the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.

Disadvantagesinclude the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through “false concern.” It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.

In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.

In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.

Theories of management provide different ways of understanding how organisations can be led effectively. Two important perspectives are thesystems approachand thecontingency approach. Both move beyond early “one best way” classical theories and instead highlight the complexity and adaptability required in modern organisations.

Thesystems approachviews the organisation as an integrated whole made up of interdependent subsystems such as HR, finance, operations and procurement. It is based on systems theory, seeing organisations as “open systems” that interact with their external environment. Inputs such as people, information and resources are transformed into outputs such as products, services and stakeholder value. Feedback loops are essential to monitor performance and make adjustments. The key idea is synergy — the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. For example, in procurement, sourcing decisions influence not only supplier performance but also finance (budgets), operations (continuity), and CSR (sustainability). A systems approach ensures that procurement strategies are aligned to wider organisational goals and continuous improvement.

Thecontingency approachdevelops this idea further, arguing that there is no universal way to manage. Instead, the best approach depends on situational factors such as environment, size, technology, or workforce capability. It rejects “one-size-fits-all” rules and stresses that management must adapt. For example, in a stable market, a hierarchical structure with formal rules may work well, whereas in volatile markets, flexible and decentralised decision-making is more effective. In procurement, this could mean using strict process controls for routine, low-value items, but adopting agile, collaborative approaches when managing strategic supplier partnerships in uncertain global supply chains.

In comparison, the systems approach gives managers aholistic viewof how different parts of the organisation connect and interact with the external environment, while the contingency approach emphasisesadaptabilityand situational leadership. Together, they suggest that effective managers need both a broad systems perspective and the ability to tailor their approach depending on context.

In conclusion, the systems approach stresses coordination, integration and feedback across the organisation, while the contingency approach stresses flexibility and the idea that “it depends.” Both are highly relevant to procurement and supply leaders who must integrate across functions and adapt strategies to dynamic and uncertain supply environments.

Stakeholders can exert influence over procurement decisions in different ways. French and Raven identifiedfive types of powerthat stakeholders may hold. Each has different implications for how procurement interacts with them.

1. Legitimate Power:

This comes from a stakeholder’s formal position or authority. For example, a Finance Director may require procurement to comply with budgetary controls. Procurement must respect legitimate authority but can also influence decisions by providing evidence and business cases.

2. Reward Power:

This is based on the ability to provide benefits or incentives. For example, senior management may reward the procurement team with recognition or bonuses for achieving savings. Procurement can use this positively by demonstrating performance and aligning with organisational goals.

3. Coercive Power:

This is the power to punish or impose sanctions. For instance, a project manager may pressure procurement to prioritise their project by threatening escalation if deadlines are missed. Procurement must manage this carefully, balancing demands with fairness and compliance.

4. Expert Power:

This arises from specialist knowledge or skills. For example, a procurement professional with strong knowledge of supplier markets holds expert power, which can influence strategic decisions. Conversely, technical departments may hold expert power in specifying product requirements, requiring procurement to collaborate closely.

5. Referent Power:

This is based on personal relationships, respect, or charisma. For example, a well-liked senior stakeholder may influence procurement decisions even without formal authority. Procurement must manage these situations by maintaining objectivity while leveraging strong relationships to gain support.

Comparison of Interaction with Procurement:

Legitimate poweroften requires compliance, while procurement may respond with process adherence and evidence-based justification.

Reward powercreates motivation for procurement, but risks short-term focus if overused.

Coercive powercan create conflict and stress; procurement must use negotiation and diplomacy to manage.

Expert powercan be collaborative, as procurement and stakeholders share knowledge to improve outcomes.

Referent powerrelies on trust and relationships, which procurement can use to build coalitions and support for initiatives.

Conclusion:

The five types of power – legitimate, reward, coercive, expert, and referent – shape how stakeholders interact with procurement. Understanding these power bases enables procurement professionals to adapt their approach, whether through compliance, persuasion, collaboration, or relationship-building. This ensures stakeholder management supports both procurement objectives and organisational goals.