2V0-13.24 VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam is now Stable and With Pass Result | Test Your Knowledge for Free

2V0-13.24 Practice Questions

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam

Last Update 3 days ago
Total Questions : 90

Dive into our fully updated and stable 2V0-13.24 practice test platform, featuring all the latest VCP-VCF Architect exam questions added this week. Our preparation tool is more than just a VMware study aid; it's a strategic advantage.

Our free VCP-VCF Architect practice questions crafted to reflect the domains and difficulty of the actual exam. The detailed rationales explain the 'why' behind each answer, reinforcing key concepts about 2V0-13.24. Use this test to pinpoint which areas you need to focus your study on.

2V0-13.24 PDF

$43.75
~~$124.99~~

Add to Cart

2V0-13.24 Testing Engine

$50.75
~~$144.99~~

Add to Cart

2V0-13.24 PDF + Testing Engine

$63.7
~~$181.99~~

Add to Cart

Question # 11

A customer is designing a new VMware Cloud Foundation stretched cluster using L2 non-uniform connectivity, where due to a past incident an attacker was able to inject some false routes into their dynamic global routing table. What design decision can be taken to prevent this when configuring the Tier-0 gateway?

Options:

OSPF MD5 authentication

Gateway Firewall with ECMP

Implicit deny for any traffic

BGP peer password

Discussion 0

Question # 12

An architect has come up with a list of design decisions after a workshop with the business stakeholders. Which design decision describes a logical design decision?

Options:

Asynchronous storage replication that satisfies a recovery point objective (RPO) of 15min between site A and B

Both sites A and B will have a /16 dedicated network subnets.

End users will interact with application server hosted in Site A

End users should always experience instantaneous application response

Discussion 0

Question # 13

An architect is working on higher-scale NSX Grouping and security design requirements for Management and VI Workload Domains in VMware Cloud Foundation. Which NSX Manager appliance size will be considered for use?

Options:

Extra Large

Large

Medium

Small

Discussion 0

Question # 14

Due to limited budget and hardware, an administrator is constrained to a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) consolidated architecture of seven ESXi hosts in a single cluster. An application that consists of two virtual machines hosted on this infrastructure requires minimal disruption to storage I/O during business hours. Which two options would be most effective in mitigating this risk without reducing availability? (Choose two.)

Options:

Apply 100% CPU and memory reservations on these virtual machines

Implement FTT=1 Mirror for this application virtual machine

Replace the vSAN shared storage exclusively with an All-Flash Fibre Channel shared storage solution

Perform all host maintenance operations outside of business hours

Enable fully automatic Distributed Resource Scheduling (DRS) policies on the cluster

Discussion 0

Answer:

B, D

Explanation:

The scenario involves a VCF consolidated architecture with seven ESXi hosts in a single cluster, likely using vSAN as the default storage (standard in VCF consolidated deployments unless specified otherwise). The goal is to minimize storage I/O disruption for an application’s two VMs during business hours while maintaining availability, all within budget and hardware constraints.

Requirement Analysis:

Minimal disruption to storage I/O:Storage I/O disruptions typically occur during vSAN resyncs, host maintenance, or resource contention.

No reduction in availability:Solutions must not compromise the cluster’s ability to keep VMs running and accessible.

Budget/hardware constraints:Options requiring new hardware purchases are infeasible.

Option Analysis:

Apply 100% CPU and memory reservations on these virtual machines:Setting 100% CPU and memory reservations ensures these VMs get their full allocated resources, preventing contention with other VMs. However, this primarily addresses compute resource contention, not storage I/O disruptions. Storage I/O is managed by vSAN (or another shared storage), and reservations do not directly influence disk latency, resync operations, or I/O performance during maintenance. The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide notes that reservations are for CPU/memory QoS, not storage I/O stability. This option does not effectively mitigate the risk and is incorrect.

Implement FTT=1 Mirror for this application virtual machine:FTT (Failures to Tolerate) = 1 with a mirroring policy (RAID-1) in vSAN ensures that each VM’s data is replicated across at least two hosts, providing fault tolerance. During business hours, if a host fails or enters maintenance, vSAN maintains data availability without immediate resync (since data is already mirrored), minimizing I/O disruption. Without this policy (e.g., FTT=0), a host failure could force a rebuild, impacting I/O. The VCF Design Guide recommends FTT=1 for critical applications to balance availability and performance. This option leverages existing hardware, maintains availability, and reduces I/O disruption risk, making it correct.

Replace the vSAN shared storage exclusively with an All-Flash Fibre Channel shared storage solution:Switching to All-Flash Fibre Channel could improve I/O performance and potentially reduce disruption (e.g., faster rebuilds), but it requires purchasing new hardware (Fibre Channel HBAs, switches, and storage arrays), which violates the budget constraint. Additionally, transitioning from vSAN (integral to VCF) to external storage in a consolidated architecture is unsupported without significant redesign, as per the VCF 5.2 Release Notes. This option is impractical and incorrect.

Perform all host maintenance operations outside of business hours:Host maintenance (e.g., patching, upgrades) in vSAN clusters triggers data resyncs as VMs and data are evacuated, potentially disrupting storage I/O during business hours. Scheduling maintenance outside business hours avoids this, ensuring I/O stability when the application is in use. This leverages DRS and vMotion (standard in VCF) to move VMs without downtime, maintaining availability. The VCF Administration Guide recommends off-peak maintenance to minimize impact, making this a cost-effective, availability-preserving solution. This option is correct.

Enable fully automatic Distributed Resource Scheduling (DRS) policies on the cluster:Fully automated DRS balances VM placement and migrates VMs to optimize resource usage. While this improves compute efficiency and can reduce contention, it does not directly mitigate storage I/O disruptions. DRS migrations can even temporarily increase I/O (e.g., during vMotion), and vSAN resyncs (triggered by maintenance or failures) are unaffected by DRS. The vSphere Resource Management Guide confirms DRS focuses on CPU/memory, not storage I/O. This option is not the most effective here and is incorrect.

Conclusion:The two most effective options areImplement FTT=1 Mirror for this application virtual machine (B)andPerform all host maintenance operations outside of business hours (D). These ensure storage redundancy and schedule disruptive operations outside critical times, maintaining availability without additional hardware.

References:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (Section: vSAN Policies)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (Section: Maintenance Planning)

VMware vSphere 8.0 Update 3 Resource Management Guide (Section: DRS and Reservations)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Release Notes (Section: Consolidated Architecture)

Question # 15

As part of the requirement gathering phase, an architect identified the following requirement for the newly deployed SDDC environment:

Reduce the network latency between two application virtual machines.

To meet the application owner's goal, which design decision should be included in the design?

Options:

Configure a Storage DRS rule to keep the application virtual machines on the same datastore.

Configure a DRS rule to keep the application virtual machines on the same ESXi host.

Configure a DRS rule to separate the application virtual machines to different ESXi hosts.

Configure a Storage DRS rule to keep the application virtual machines on different datastores.

Discussion 0

Question # 16

An architect is evaluating a requirement for a Cloud Management self-service solution to offer its users the ability to migrate their own workloads using VMware vMotion. Which component could the architect include in the solution design that will help satisfy the requirement?

Options:

Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager

Aria Automation Orchestrator

Aria Operations

Aria Automation Config

Discussion 0

Question # 17

An architect is designing a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based Private Cloud solution. During the requirements gathering workshop, a stakeholder from the network team stated that:

The solution must ensure that any physical networking component is redundant to N+N.

The solution must ensure inter-datacenter network links are diversely routed.

When writing the design documentation, how should the architect classify the stated requirement?

Options:

Availability

Performance

Recoverability

Manageability

Discussion 0

Question # 18

A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design mandates that:

All availability zones must operate independently of each other.

The availability SLA must adhere to no less than 99.9%.

What would be the three design decisions that would help satisfy those requirements? (Choose three.)

Options:

Configure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain

Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s)

Make sure the recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components has access to both AZ(s)

Choose two distant AZ(s) and consider each AZ the DR for the other

Choose two close proximity AZ(s) and configure a stretched management workload domain

Configure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ

Discussion 0

Answer:

A, B, F

Explanation:

This scenario involves a VCF multi-AZ design where AZs must operate independently (no shared dependencies) and achieve a 99.9% availability SLA (allowing ~8.76 hours of downtime annually). The design decisions must ensure resilience, fault isolation, and recovery capabilities across AZs.

Requirement Analysis:

Independent AZ operation:Each AZ must function standalone, with no single point of failure or dependency across AZs.

99.9% availability:The design must minimize downtime through redundancy, replication, and recovery mechanisms.

Option Analysis:

Configure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain:Array-based replication (e.g., vSphere Replication or SAN replication) for the management domain (vCenter, NSX Manager, SDDC Manager) ensures that critical management VMs are duplicated across AZs. If one AZ fails, the other can take over with minimal downtime, supporting independent operation and high availability. The VCF 5.2 Design Guide recommends replication for multi-AZ deployments to meet SLAs, as it provides a recovery point objective (RPO) near zero. This option enhances availability and is correct.

Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s):Replicating configuration backups (e.g., SDDC Manager backups, NSX configurations) ensures that each AZ has access to recovery data. If an AZ’s management components fail, the other AZ can restore operations independently using its local backup copy. This supports the independence requirement and reduces downtime (contributing to 99.9% SLA) by enabling quick recovery. The VCF Administration Guide emphasizes backup replication for multi-AZ resilience, making this option correct.

Make sure the recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components has access to both AZ(s):A recovery VLAN spanning both AZs implies a shared network dependency. If this VLAN fails (e.g., due to a network outage), both AZs could be impacted, violating the independence requirement. Multi-AZ designs in VCF favor isolated networks per AZ to avoid cross-AZ single points of failure. The VCF Design Guide advises against shared VLANs for critical components in independent AZ setups. This option undermines the requirements and is incorrect.

Choose two distant AZ(s) and consider each AZ the DR for the other:Distant AZs (e.g., separate data centers) with mutual DR (disaster recovery) roles enhance geographic fault tolerance. However, “operate independently” in VCF typically means each AZ can run workloads standalone, not that one is a passive DR site. Distant AZs introduce latency, complicating synchronous replication needed for 99.9% availability, and may rely on shared management, conflicting with independence. The VCF Multi-AZ Guide focuses on active-active AZs, not DR-centric designs, making this less suitable.

Choose two close proximity AZ(s) and configure a stretched management workload domain:A stretched management domain (e.g., using vSAN stretched cluster) spans AZs with synchronous replication, ensuring high availability. However, this creates a dependency: both AZs share the same vCenter and management stack, so a failure (e.g., vCenter outage) could affect both, violating independence. The VCF 5.2 Design Guide notes stretched clusters are for single logical domains, not independent AZs. This option contradicts the requirement and is incorrect.

Configure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ:A non-routable, AZ-specific recovery VLAN isolates management recovery traffic (e.g., for vMotion, backups) within each AZ. This ensures that each AZ’s management components operate independently, with no cross-AZ network reliance. If one AZ’s network fails, the other remains unaffected, supporting the SLA through fault isolation. The VCF Multi-AZ Design Guide recommends separate, isolated networks per AZ for resilience, making this option correct.

Conclusion:The three design decisions areConfigure array-based replication between the selected AZ(s) for the management domain (A),Make sure all configuration backups are replicated between the selected AZ(s) (B), andConfigure a non-routable separate recovery VLAN for the infrastructure management components within each AZ (F). These ensure independent operation and meet the 99.9% SLA through replication and isolation.

References:

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (Section: Multi-AZ Design)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (Section: Backup and Recovery)

VMware Cloud Foundation Multi-AZ Deployment Guide (Section: Networking)

VMware vSphere 8.0 Update 3 Documentation (Section: vSAN Stretched Clusters)

Question # 19

During the requirements gathering workshop for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based Private Cloud solution, the customer states that the solution must:

• Provide sufficient capacity to migrate and run their existing workloads.

• Provide sufficient initial capacity to support a forecasted resource growth of 30% over the next 3 years.

When creating the design document, under which design quality should the architect classify these stated requirements?

Options:

Availability

Performance

Recoverability

Manageability

Discussion 0

Question # 20

An architect is designing a new VCF solution to meet the following requirements:

The solution must be deployed across two availability zones.

The physical hosts must be installed in a single rack per availability zone.

Workloads running in the cluster must be able to run on hosts in either availability zone.

The architect has decided that to meet these requirements, the solution will be deployed using the Single Instance - Multiple Availability Zones VCF Topology. When considering the design for the network, what should the architect include in the logical design to meet these requirements?

Options:

A physical network fabric in a leaf-spine configuration with dual Cisco switches within each availability zone.

A highly available gateway that supports the failure of an entire availability zone.

A 25-GbE port on each Top of Rack (ToR) switch connected to the ESXi host uplinks.

A single NSX Overlay Transport Zone for all clusters to carry the traffic between the ESXi hosts.

Discussion 0

Get 2V0-13.24 dumps and pass your exam in 24 hours!

Pre-Summer Sale Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: 65pass65

2V0-13.24 VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam is now Stable and With Pass Result | Test Your Knowledge for Free

2V0-13.24 Practice Questions

2V0-13.24 PDF

2V0-13.24 Testing Engine

2V0-13.24 PDF + Testing Engine

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Options:

Free Exams Sample Questions

We Accept

Secure Site

Customer Review

Money Back Guarantee