Identity-Security-Administrator Practice Questions
SailPoint Certified Identity Security Administrator
Last Update 1 day ago
Total Questions : 99
Dive into our fully updated and stable Identity-Security-Administrator practice test platform, featuring all the latest SailPoint Professional exam questions added this week. Our preparation tool is more than just a SailPoint study aid; it's a strategic advantage.
Our free SailPoint Professional practice questions crafted to reflect the domains and difficulty of the actual exam. The detailed rationales explain the 'why' behind each answer, reinforcing key concepts about Identity-Security-Administrator. Use this test to pinpoint which areas you need to focus your study on.
An organization is considering purchasing an IGA tool. The manager asks the administrator to explain what compliance features the IGA tool provides for separation of duties, protecting personally identifying data and privileged access, and how the company can prove to the auditors that they comply with all laws and regulations.
Is this a good explanation of one of such features?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
"The vendor has provided proof that the tool complies with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SoX, ISO 27002 and the GDPR. The fact that we use this IGA tool is sufficient legal proof for the auditors that we comply with all regulations."
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Below are the requirements for configuring user provisioning in an organization's Finance department.
Contractors in the organization MUST NOT be auto-provisioned with the default Office 365 license, as contractors in departments other than Finance have different license requirements.
Every Finance department user — whether employee or contractor — must be assigned one Office 365 E3 license.
No Finance employee or contractor should be provisioned more than one type of Office 365 license.
Is this a valid approach for the Identity Security Administrator to provide the necessary access?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
Create an ISC Role with membership criteria that includes all Finance department users and associate the Office 365 E3 license entitlement with the role. This ensures Finance department users receive E3 license access automatically.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Is this a valid statement regarding role management?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
To test role membership criteria, it is best to keep the role in a disabled state and run a refresh.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Review the following log entry:
[
{
"id": "2c9180866166b5b0016167c32ef31a66",
"name": "acme AD-TX Cluster",
"description": "acme AD - TX Cluster",
"clientType": "CCG",
"ccgVersion": "373_535_70.2.0",
"pinnedConfig": true,
"logConfiguration": null
},
{
"id": "2c9180846a93ce60016ab29f039944de",
"name": "acme AD-NY Cluster",
"description": "acme AD-NY Cluster",
"clientType": "CCG",
"ccgVersion": "373_535_70.2.0",
"pinnedConfig": true,
"logConfiguration": {
"clientId": null,
"durationMinutes": 60,
"expiration": "2025-12-15T19:13:36.079Z",
"rootLevel": "TRACE",
"logLevels": {
"sailpoint.connector.ADLDAPConnector": "TRACE"
}
}
}
]
A source owner for Active Directory has found problems with aggregation and has requested log files for their source.
Is this a valid way for the Administrator to assist in retrieving the correct logs?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
The Admin can set the log level using the following REST API call and JSON request body:
PUT /v2025/managed-clusters/2c9180866166b5b0016167c32ef31a66/log-config
{
"durationMinutes": 365,
"rootLevel": "DEBUG",
"logLevels": {
"sailpoint.connector.ADLDAPConnector": "DEBUG"
}
}
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Is this a valid purpose for creating an identity profile?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
To assign specific permissions or access to users based on roles.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Regarding the Access Certification Process, is the following statement valid?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
A sign-off page becomes visible only after the reviewer has completed all required decisions.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Below are the requirements for configuring user provisioning in an organization's Finance department.
Contractors in the organization MUST NOT be auto-provisioned with the default Office 365 license, as contractors in departments other than Finance have different license requirements.
Every Finance department user — whether employee or contractor — must be assigned one Office 365 E3 license.
No Finance employee or contractor should be provisioned more than one type of Office 365 license.
Is this a valid approach for the Identity Security Administrator to provide the necessary access?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
Create an ISC Role with membership criteria that includes all Finance department contractors. Assign an Access Profile associated with the default Office 365 license. Add these users to the Office 365 E3 license entitlement so they receive an account with the default Office 365 license and the required E3 license.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Is the following true regarding User Levels and permissions?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
Role Admin and Source Sub-Admin can be granted to an identity at the same time.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
Is this a true statement regarding identity attribute mappings and identity profiles?
Proposed Solution / Statement:
Username, last name, and work email must have a value.
Does this proposed solution meet the requirement / solve the scenario?
