FCSS_NST_SE-7.6 Practice Questions

The correct answers are A and D .

The Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide explains that automation stitches consist of a trigger and one or more actions , and that they can detect events such as high CPU and conserve mode across the Security Fabric

The FortiOS administration guide then gives the exact practical example for A :

“Automation stitches can be created to run a CLI script and send an email message when memory or CPU usage exceeds specified thresholds.”

It also shows examples where the email body contains the script output using:

%%results%%

That directly confirms A .

For D , the FortiOS administration guide states:

“The URI and HTTP body can use parameters from logs or previous action results.”

It also explains the execution model:

“The stitch Action execution can be set to either Sequential or Parallel. In sequential execution actions will execute one after another with a delay (if specified). … In parallel execution all actions will execute immediately when the stitch is triggered.”

A concrete example shows a second action using the output of the first action:

“This string for the body text includes the results from the preceding CLI script action.” with

Body=%%results%%...

That confirms D .

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because automation stitches can be triggered by IPS events, but the documentation does not describe them as modifying packet headers or payloads. Instead, they perform actions such as email, CLI script, webhook, quarantine, and similar automated responses

C is wrong because delay is associated with sequential execution, not parallel execution. The guide explicitly says: “A delay can be added before an action if Sequential action execution is used.”

So the verified answers are: A, D .

The correct answers are A and C .

The exhibit shows that preserve-session-route is enabled on port1:

config system interface

edit " port1 "

set preserve-session-route enable

next

end

The study guide explains the effect of this setting exactly:

“enable: FortiGate marks existing session routing information as persistent, and applies only the modified routes to new sessions”

It also states:

“The current route must still be present in the FI

B.  

And the same page further clarifies:

“If you enable this setting, sessions passing through that interface continue to pass without being affected by the routing changes. The routing changes apply only to new sessions. If the route is removed from the FIB, then FortiGate must flag the session as dirty, flush its gateway information, and reevaluate the session.”

This proves:

A is correct because with preserve-session-route enable, existing sessions are normally preserved and routing changes apply only to new sessions.

C is correct because the session remains unchanged unless the current route is removed from the FIB/routing table, in which case FortiGate dirties and reevaluates the session.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because when the active route is removed, FortiGate does not simply mark the session dirty and stop there. The study guide says it “flags the session as dirty and reevaluates it” , which means route lookup happens again.

D is wrong because the session does change if the active route is removed. FortiGate flushes gateway information and reevaluates the session.

So the verified answers are: A, C .

The correct answers are A and D .

The debug output shows:

Sent RADIUS req to server ' RadiusServer ' : IP=172.25.188.164 ... user= " student " using CHAP

Result for radius svr ' RadiusServer ' 172.25.188.164(0) is 0

Sending result 0 for req 2

The study guide explains that in RADIUS real-time debug, FortiGate shows the IP address of the RADIUS server it is querying. In the example, it says FortiGate “creates an access request to the RADIUS server at IP address 10.0.13.130” and shows the line Sent radius req to server ... IP=10.0.13.130

So in your exhibit, the queried server is clearly 172.25.188.164 , which makes A correct.

The study guide also states:

“The message fnbamd_comm_send_result-Sending result 0 indicates that the authentication was successful and that FortiGate received the Access-Accept message.”

Since your exhibit also ends with Sending result 0 , that makes D correct.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because result 0 means authentication successful , not failed

C is wrong because the debug explicitly shows using CHAP , and the study guide lists supported RADIUS schemes as CHAP, PAP, MS-CHAP, and MS-CHAPv2

E is wrong because the study guide says two-factor authentication would involve an Access-Challenge response: “If two-factor authentication is enabled on the server, the response is an Access-Challenge message” Your exhibit shows successful result 0 / Access-Accept , not a challenge.

So the verified answers are: A, D .

To determine the correct conclusions, we analyze the specific lines in the IKE real-time debug output provided in the exhibit:

Analysis for Option A (The remote peer is the initiating peer):

Evidence: The very first line of the debug output reads: ike 0:624000:98: responder: main mode get 1st message...

The keyword responder indicates that this local FortiGate is receiving the connection request. Consequently, the remote peer must be the initiator sending the request. The phrase " get 1st message " confirms the local unit is receiving the initial packet of the negotiation sequence.

Conclusion: This statement is True.

Analysis for Option B (This is a phase 1 negotiation):

Evidence: The same line mentions main mode.

In IPsec VPNs, Main Mode and Aggressive Mode are exclusively used for Phase 1 (IKE SA) negotiations. Phase 2 (Child SA) negotiations use Quick Mode. The presence of " main mode " definitively identifies this as a Phase 1 exchange.

Conclusion: This statement is True.

Analysis for Option C (There is a Diffie-Hellman group mismatch):

Evidence:

Incoming proposal (Remote): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14) in the first proposal proposal.

My proposal (Local): Lists type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP2048 (Group 14).

Since both the remote peer and the local gateway support and are proposing MODP2048 (Group 14), there is no Diffie-Hellman group mismatch. The actual mismatch visible in the logs is between the Encryption/Hash algorithms (Remote proposes AES-256/SHA2-256, while Local proposes AES-128/SHA), but the DH groups match.

Conclusion: This statement is False.

Analysis for Option D (This is a phase 2 negotiation):

As established in the analysis for Option B, " Main Mode " is a Phase 1 protocol. If this were Phase 2, the debug would show " Quick Mode " .

Conclusion: This statement is False.