NS0-194 Practice Exam Questions and Answers

Your customer's MetroCluster has generated a "DISK REDUNDANCY FAILED" message.

Netapp-EmA:

Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:15 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111161] was removed

Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111160] was removed

Netapp-EmB:

Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.

Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111167] was removed

Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111164] was removed

Referring to the messages shown in the exhibit for each node, which component is causing the problem?

How many data-serving SVMs are supported with Cloud Volumes ONTAP that is running ONTAP 9.5?

You are working on a fabric MetroCluster. After a site failure, the plex starts to resync automatically to the aggregate mirror of Aggr1. The plex now shows a status of resyncing. During this process, you experience a slow resync of the SyncMirror plex.

In this scenario, how do you solve the problem?

A disaster causes a FlexGroup volume to be unrecoverable, but it was protected by a SnapMirror relationship. You solve the issue, and the source is operational. Now, you want to return to serving the data from the original source.

In this scenario, what do you do next?

Source Path Destination Path Relationship ID Relationship Type

msgld: msragld: 78e304e0-9781-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

msxpgld: msraxpgld: 3ca42ab4-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_docavgld: ndradocavgld: a4b233b2-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_dr: ndradr: c97d36a0-6d7c-11e8-83fb-00a098d771bd XDP

na_gld: ndragld: 9e7e034d-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_mpgld: ndrampgld: 16e52e0d-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_opengld: ndraopengld: dabb1813-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_poc: ndrapoc: c1d632d7-977b-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

na_pubgld: ndrapubgld: 1a3f866c-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP

Referring to the output, which type of SnapMirror destination relationship is being used?

Which two statements describe ONTAP NVRAM? (Choose two.)

Referring to the exhibit, which two components should be examined? (Choose two.)

A customer must store physical hard copies of transaction data off site to meet regulatory requirements.

Which NetApp technology enables the customer to accomplish this task?

You have an ONTAP 2-node cluster. You run a read/write test workload against an SMB share, and it is slower than you expected. You run the same test again, but this time you monitor the storage using a QoS command.

Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?